Ferdinand de Saussure
Paperback | Pages: 236 pages Rating: 3.96 | 2742 Users | 121 Reviews
Declare Out Of Books Course in General Linguistics (Seri ILDEP #35)
| Title | : | Course in General Linguistics (Seri ILDEP #35) |
| Author | : | Ferdinand de Saussure |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 236 pages |
| Published | : | 1998 by Open Court (first published 1915) |
| Categories | : | Humanities. Linguistics. Philosophy. Nonfiction. Language. Theory. Cultural. France |
Explanation Conducive To Books Course in General Linguistics (Seri ILDEP #35)
The Cours de linguistique generale, reconstructed from students' notes after Saussure's death in 1913, founded modern linguistic theory by breaking the study of language free from a merely historical and comparativist approach. Saussure's new method, now known as Structuralism, has since been applied to such diverse areas as art, architecture, folklore, literary criticism, and philosophy.
Identify Books As Course in General Linguistics (Seri ILDEP #35)
| Original Title: | Cours de linguistique générale |
| ISBN: | 0812690230 (ISBN13: 9780812690231) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Series: | Seri ILDEP #35 |
| Literary Awards: | Scott Moncrieff Prize for Roy Harris (1984) |
Rating Out Of Books Course in General Linguistics (Seri ILDEP #35)
Ratings: 3.96 From 2742 Users | 121 ReviewsCrit Out Of Books Course in General Linguistics (Seri ILDEP #35)
The book is indubitably an important landmark in the history of linguistics, but it is of only very limited interest in the context of contemporary linguistics. Many of the ideas presented therein are mostly obsolete nowadays, while the ones which are not can be learned from many other sources (including numerous summaries of de Saussure).I wonder who could benefit from reading this book today (2020)?*Professional linguists and researchers? Not really, since the obsolete state of knowledgeThe section on synchronic linguistics is brilliant, but the latter half of the book - on diachronic linguistics - is a little pointless for someone who isn't actually interested in the history of languages. Also, the specific linguistic examples are a bit overwhelming for someone who isn't already immersed in the field. Fortunately, it's easy to skim over them and get the general gist of the argument.It doesn't feel like Saussure was aware of how profound some of his ideas are, particularly his
Absolutely in awe of this unit. Lots to learn.
I can't but rate such book by full stars. It's simply a reference to all who's interested in linguistic studies, simple enough for an amateur and essential for a professional. As we all know it's not Saussure himself who wrote this book, which is an amazing fact for its own account, for now we're reading the believes and the understanding of his students about this subject matter. The great thing about the general course of linguistic is that it tackles all the important parts of this fields, it
If you, like I, have some troubles getting into and understanding the later, French structuralists, then this work might help with the understanding. While it mainly is a scientific work on linguistics, de Saussure's work on linguistics signs creates an easy to understand basis from which to approach more dense works of philosophy.
Short of calling it a pioneer text, it's difficult to really say much else about Saussure's Course in General Linguistics. As dated as most of the ideas contained within this book are, most of them stand as the founding concepts of linguistics, semiotics, and structuralism. Or, a more grammatically apt way to put it would be to say that it is Saussure's particular methodology that has been the most influential aspect of his thought. His central aim above all else is to analyze language as a
It is almost impossible to overstate the importance of this book. It is significant not only for laying down a radical vision of linguistics as a discipline for the 20th and 21st centuries, but it also lays the foundations for all modern approaches to semiotics. Certainly Peirce had made a similar breakthrough in semiotics at around the same time, but his theory was not backed up by such a rich understanding of the study of linguistics - its sub-fields and divisions, the progress it had made,
0 Comments