James Surowiecki
Paperback | Pages: 306 pages Rating: 3.81 | 21956 Users | 717 Reviews
List Epithetical Books The Wisdom of Crowds
| Title | : | The Wisdom of Crowds |
| Author | : | James Surowiecki |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 306 pages |
| Published | : | August 16th 2005 by Anchor (first published May 19th 2004) |
| Categories | : | Nonfiction. Business. Psychology. Economics. Sociology. Science |
Narrative Supposing Books The Wisdom of Crowds
In this fascinating book, New Yorker business columnist James Surowiecki explores a deceptively simple idea: Large groups of people are smarter than an elite few, no matter how brilliant–better at solving problems, fostering innovation, coming to wise decisions, even predicting the future.With boundless erudition and in delightfully clear prose, Surowiecki ranges across fields as diverse as popular culture, psychology, ant biology, behavioral economics, artificial intelligence, military history, and politics to show how this simple idea offers important lessons for how we live our lives, select our leaders, run our companies, and think about our world.
Identify Books In Favor Of The Wisdom of Crowds
| Original Title: | The Wisdom of Crowds |
| ISBN: | 0385721706 (ISBN13: 9780385721707) |
| Edition Language: | English URL http://www.randomhouse.com/features/wisdomofcrowds/ |
Rating Epithetical Books The Wisdom of Crowds
Ratings: 3.81 From 21956 Users | 717 ReviewsJudge Epithetical Books The Wisdom of Crowds
The Wisdom of Crowds takes a scientific look at the theory that given the right composition and the right problems to solve, a group can collectively be smarter than its smartest member. It sounds like it can't be true, I know, but the author is quite convincing. The book details three different types of problems crowds can help solve:1. Cognition problems: Problems that have definitive solution, such as how many jelly beans are in this big jar?2. Coordination problems: Problems that requireReally the best way to review this book is to just star it, right?
This is a great book. Well worth the read.Still, I can sum it in a couple of sentences, and then you only need to read it if you want the supporting arguments.Large groups of people tend to arrive at the correct resolution to complex issues far more frequently than individuals do. This happens when the wrong answers are randomly distributed, and the experts cast the deciding votes. You would be surprised how often this happens. Read the book for cases to keep an eye on biased wrong answers
I enjoyed this book. I wrote a review and then read everyone else's review and decided to return to write something more to the point. Some people did not even finish the book so I'd like highlight a few important concepts Surowiecki was trying to communicate.The four essential conditions that make up a smart or wise crowd are: - Diversity of OpinionEach person must have some private information that he/she brings to the group. Their own interpretation or their own understanding of the problem
Im trying to remember the first time I heard the phrase: Group Think. It might have been when a teacher pointed out a logical fallacy during a group presentation, or from a judge in a debate tournament, but I definitely remember hearing the phrase in reaction to the second gulf war and all the accusations and recriminations associated with it. Like many people, I heard that phrase and wondered: is that the polite way of saying: we all screwed up? Though he writes as part of the aftermath of the
An interesting book that presents compelling arguments in favor of drastically overhauling the way group decision-making is commonly practiced in American schools and workplaces in order to enhance the possibility of better outcomes. Anyone who has ever worked in a group will recognize many of the dynamics he describes - from the dominance of those who speak the most (regardless of the merits of the content they contribute) to unconscious deference to those of higher status (regardless of
0 Comments