Declare Out Of Books Women in Love (Brangwen Family #2)
| Title | : | Women in Love (Brangwen Family #2) |
| Author | : | D.H. Lawrence |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | thrift |
| Pages | : | Pages: 416 pages |
| Published | : | January 15th 2003 by Dover Publications (first published 1920) |
| Categories | : | Classics. Fiction |
D.H. Lawrence
Paperback | Pages: 416 pages Rating: 3.67 | 28699 Users | 1051 Reviews
Narration In Favor Of Books Women in Love (Brangwen Family #2)
Widely regarded as D. H. Lawrence's greatest novel, Women in Love is both a lucid account of English society before the First World War, and a brilliant evocation of the inexorable power of human desire.Women in Love continues where The Rainbow left off, with the third generation of Brangwens: Ursula Brangwen, now a teacher at Beldover, a mining town in the Midlands, and her sister Gudrun, who has returned from art school in London. The focus of the novel is primarily on their relationships, Ursula's with Rupert Birkin, a school inspector, and Gudrun's with industrialist Gerald Crich, and later with a sculptor, Loerke. Quintessentially modernist, Women in Love is one of Lawrence's most extraordinary, innovative and unsettling works.
Present Books Supposing Women in Love (Brangwen Family #2)
| Original Title: | Women in Love |
| ISBN: | 0486424588 (ISBN13: 9780486424583) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Series: | Brangwen Family #2 |
| Characters: | Gudrun Brangwen, Ursula Brangwen, Gerald Crich |
Rating Out Of Books Women in Love (Brangwen Family #2)
Ratings: 3.67 From 28699 Users | 1051 ReviewsCrit Out Of Books Women in Love (Brangwen Family #2)
After 170 pages I had to give up. I couldnt relate to these upper class snobs who just whined endlessly about how dreadful life is. Go get a job I say change some diapers, cook a dinner, Have a glass of wine. Do something! Its repetitive with misanthropic conversations like:Page 140 (my book)There was silence, wherein she wanted to cry. She reached for another bit of chocolate paper, and began to fold another boat.And why is it, she asked at length, that there is no flowering, no dignity ofListen, I am redrafting a 500-page novel I wrote between the ages of 19-21. I have a comp sci degree to complete. I have 20+ Xmas books to read, I have 90+ movies to watch, I have the Guided by Voices canon to penetrate. There is no time for a witty capsule opinion of Women in Love, mright? Believe me when I assert that this raw, raving, rage-filled, ragged-ass novel is something of an overwritten masterwork. Gnight, asshats.
It is Lawrence's most complete statement. He argues with himself all through it: struggling to find a way to define what he wants to know about the individual and others. The characters are intense, fierce, intelligent, combative. They clash; they pound into each other. Lawrence explores ideas through the fist-tight dialogue and the bold imagery. And he quests for answers in his insistent narrative too. Ursula remains the real centre of the book, but Birkin, Gudrun and Gerald all get close-up
Ever noticed how many people hate DH Lawrence? Often for opposite reasons by the way--there are those who condemn his misognyny, while others allege him to be too doting of the fair sex. Which is it? Sometimes he's damned for being too obscene, but elsewhere dismissed as overly fussy about flowers and horses. He even gets clubbed for creating self-absorbed characters, just after someone has taken a swipe at him for promoting a harmful ideal of sacrificial love. All of these folks can agree that
Username : PBRYANT999Password : FlibbertygibbetENTERWelcome to the GOODREADS AUTOREVIEW PROGRAM ™. Thank you for participating in this preliminary trial. Please enter the title of the book you wish to reviewWOMEN IN LOVEPlease enter the author name D. H. LAWRENCESelect type of work from the drop down menuNOVELSelect century this NOVEL was written in20THHave you personally read any works by this author previously?YESHow much enjoyment did you derive from these works please choose from drop down
I want to find you, where you dont know your own existence, the you that your common self denies utterly. But I dont want your good looks, and I dont want your womanly feelings, and I dont want your thoughts nor opinions nor your ideasthey are all bagatellas to me. If youve already experienced gag reflex, then you know what to partly expect from this book. Yet to say this was all this book was about, would mean I did not take the time to read all of it. After having had friendly debates about
The central claim of this book is that love between man and womb-an,While spiritually profound, is yet not enough for a true man;He must also have deep friendship with another man, like a flame- Not in a homosexual way, as some braindead reviewers have claimed,Reading their 2000s prejudices into the work of a proto-fascistWho felt that masculine/feminine archetypes should be more stubborn and fractious,That they should be of value in themselves, not just as the means to a union,And that only by
0 Comments